4 thoughts on “YouTube SHORT: Jesus’ crucifixion was prophesied in Daniel 9?”
Hi, can you publish a post about the Catholic “miracle” of the Sun in portugal? while it’s a conspiracy theory to any reasonable researcher, it, like all other conspiracy theories, falsification-resistant as it is reinforced by circular reasoning. However, if you could publish one, you would have dealt a massive damage to Christianity. Perhaps it will teach Christians to reason.
The funny thing is they cherry-pick and present pseudoscientists who would say it was actually a miracle. If they look deep enough they’ll find pseudoscientists who would bring “evidence” in support of reincarnation or ancient pagan pseudoscientific practices, and these obviously conflict with Catholic beliefs.
Part of the problem with answering this question is the underlying question of “which Daniel?”. There is a major textual problem here in that Daniel is a book that has been heavily redacted over time and existed in multiple very different versions. I’ll list the different versions of verse 9.25-26 here so you can see the problem, the NETS is the New English Translation of the Septuagint, and contains a good introduction to Daniel. A good secondary resource would be the entry in the Anchor Bible Dictionary by John J. Collins:
Hi, can you publish a post about the Catholic “miracle” of the Sun in portugal? while it’s a conspiracy theory to any reasonable researcher, it, like all other conspiracy theories, falsification-resistant as it is reinforced by circular reasoning. However, if you could publish one, you would have dealt a massive damage to Christianity. Perhaps it will teach Christians to reason.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The funny thing is they cherry-pick and present pseudoscientists who would say it was actually a miracle. If they look deep enough they’ll find pseudoscientists who would bring “evidence” in support of reincarnation or ancient pagan pseudoscientific practices, and these obviously conflict with Catholic beliefs.
LikeLiked by 1 person
how do you make a prophecy from a text which is corrupt in transmission and translation?
https://old.reddit.com/r/AcademicBiblical/comments/10hjmul/how_familiar_were_1st_century_jews_with_the_book/
the xtians who are clearly well read on the subject are honest enough to say the daniel is corrupt.
LikeLike
quote:
Part of the problem with answering this question is the underlying question of “which Daniel?”. There is a major textual problem here in that Daniel is a book that has been heavily redacted over time and existed in multiple very different versions. I’ll list the different versions of verse 9.25-26 here so you can see the problem, the NETS is the New English Translation of the Septuagint, and contains a good introduction to Daniel. A good secondary resource would be the entry in the Anchor Bible Dictionary by John J. Collins:
end quote
LikeLike