As-salaam alaikum! The videos keep coming, alhamdulillah! In the newest video, I attempt to educate some brainless Christian trolls about the controversy surrounding the “Prophet” of Deuteronomy 18. If you haven’t seen the previous video of my discussion on Nadir Ahmed’s discussion with Michael Brown, see here.
Reblogged this on Blogging Theology.
LikeLike
@ QB
They actually have a bigger problem because Jesus(peace be upon him) has no father he is not of “the sons of Israel” therefore technically he only fulfilled 1 of the 4 of Brown’s conditions.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Details, details. Christians have no time for details.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Whelp, no thought about it according to their text he(as) hears ONE statement from Allah:
And a voice from heaven said, “This is my Son, whom I love; with him I am well pleased.”
https://biblehub.com/matthew/3-17.htm
LikeLiked by 2 people
The poor son was pretty neglected 😢.
LikeLike
This true according to their own scriptures 🙂 even famous;
“eli(my God) eli(My God) why have you forsaken me”
Matthew 27:46
LikeLiked by 1 person
Does even that count? As it seems more directed to John the Baptist(a.s) than toward Jesus(a.s)
Not to mention the multitude of people who should have heard it.
LikeLiked by 2 people
@ Vaqas
Well believe it or not the event is mass attested (but it has been modified) Now can someone say a line, leave and be declared “knowing someone face to face” is up for interpretation.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign. Look, the young woman[a] is with child and shall bear a son, and shall name him Immanuel
here the woman is to name the child immanuel which is a specific name
https://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?Strongs=H8034&t=KJV
here it is not clear if it is a specific name or a description of someone.
god gives a sign and it seems to me that the naming is part of the sign, yet the missionaries will spin the text and say that it is the meaning which is meant, so why can’t one apply the meaning excuse to deut 18:18?
LikeLiked by 2 people
jewish apologists will say that when they think about “shua” they think about prophets like joshua . when they use words like “save” “to save” “saving” “saviour” “salvation”
they do not have jesus or christianity in mind, but how yhwh performed horrific violence through joshua after the jews repented and turned to yhwh .
what has “shua” through an ot lens got to do with pauls “joshua” ? nothing.
LikeLike