Showing kindness to neighbors

Narrated `Aisha:

The Prophet (ﷺ) said “Gabriel continued to recommend me about treating the neighbors Kindly and politely so much so that I thought he would order me to make them as my heirs (Sahih Bukhari).

92 thoughts on “Showing kindness to neighbors

    1. Surah 5:51 says “allies”, not friends. This is talking about allying ourselves with non-Muslims rather than Muslims. This is clarified by Surah 60:8-9:

      “60:8-9 – Allah forbids you not, with regard to those who fight you not for (your) Faith nor drive you out of your homes, from dealing kindly and justly with them: for Allah loveth those who are just.  Allah only forbids you, with regard to those who fight you for (your) Faith, and drive you out of your homes, and support (others) in driving you out, from turning to them (for friendship and protection). It is such as turn to them (in these circumstances), that do wrong.”

      Surah 9 also says “allies”. But showing kindness to non-believing relatives is enjoined. See Surah 29:8

      “29:8 – We have enjoined on man kindness to parents: but if they (either of them) strive (to force) thee to join with Me (in worship) anything of which thou hast no knowledge, obey them not. Ye have (all) to return to me, and I will tell you (the truth) of all that ye did.”

      Liked by 4 people

    2. Also see this Hadith:

      Mujahid narrated:

      “Abdullah bin Amr had a sheep slaughtered for his family, so when he came he said: ‘Have you given some to our neighbor, the Jew? Have you given some to our neighbor, the Jew? I heard the Messenger of Allah saying: ‘Jibril continued to advise me about (treating) the neighbors so (kindly and politely), that I thought he would order me (from Allah) to make them heirs.”

      Liked by 2 people

      1. You’re jumping again. I already refuted you on this. This is referring to the end times and also refers to a particular group of Jews, not all Jews.

        In contrast, your Bible refers to some Jews as the “synagogue of Satan” who will be destroyed by Jesus.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. Really, so how come hadith from last 1500 years were authentic and now the hadith embarrass Muslims. So they become hadith expert. Go get your evidence. If Muslim like you crush the sunnah of Muhammad without any shame then i can’t trust Muslims.


      3. Lol, who says they were all authentic? Are you really this stupid? Scholars criticized hadiths all the time. Only Sahih Bukhari and Sahih Muslim were regarded as fully authentic by most scholars. Don’t comment on a topic you have no knowledge about.

        And again, you lied about the Hadith anyway. It does not say “our father”. Admit it and stop crying.

        Liked by 1 person

      4. 😆 That doesn’t change the fact that they are weak hadiths, you idiot! You see there is a heirarchy:


        Weak hadiths have a defect in some way which reduces the confidence in their authenticity. But using weak hadiths to make rulings is generally accepted.

        And again, you were caught lying about the Hadith anyway, you toilet-cleaning monkey. It does not say “our father”. You keep jumping around like a diseased baboon to avoid admitting this. Now go clean more toilets. 😂


      1. 😂🤣😂 I can see you are getting frustrated after being roasted again. Blame yourself for being such an idiot. Get an education first monkey, so that you won’t be a dumb-dumb with the intellect of a child your whole life.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. Abu Dawud was a great scholar who meticulously mentioned if a Hadith was weak himself!

        “Abu Dawood compiled twenty-one books related to Hadith and preferred those ahadith which were supported by the example of the companions of Muhammad. As for the contradictory ahadith, he states under the heading of ‘Meat acquired by hunting for a pilgrim’: “if there are two contradictory reports from the Prophet (SAW), an investigation should be made to establish what his companions have adopted”. He wrote in his letter to the people of Mecca “I have disclosed wherever there was too much weakness in regard to any tradition in my collection. But if I happen to leave a Hadith without any comment, it should be considered as sound, albeit some of them are more authentic than others”. Hadith Mursal (a tradition in which a companion is omitted and a successor narrates directly from Muhammad) has also been a matter of discussion among the traditionists. Abu Dawood states in his letter to the people of Mecca: “if a Musnad Hadith (uninterrupted tradition) is not contrary to a Mursal or a Musnad Hadith is not found, then the Mursal Hadith will be accepted though it would not be considered as strong as a Muttasil Hadith (uninterrupted chain).”


      3. Hahaha Wikipedia is your source. Your blogs are source in refuting Pact of Umar. Grow up kid this is why when Sam Shamoun challenged you, like a small kid you ran under your mother’s skirt. Hahaha what a fart brat you are.


      4. So no refutation monkey? Jumping again? I used a quick search of Abu Dawud which was on Wikipedia. It refutes your idiocy and shows how clueless you are. Stop crying monkey and go back to hide under your masters’ pants. How are those toilets? Are they clean yet?


      5. 🤣😂🤣 You are an idiot who doesn’t know how to read! Look at what it says dummy!

        “With regard to the other books of Sunan, they are not free of some da’eef (weak) ahaadeeth here and there. Some of them are noted as such by the authors themselves, and others have been pointed out by other scholars. They did not point out all the weak ahaadeeth, because they narrated the ahaadeeth with their isnaads, so it is easy for the scholars to tell the saheeh ahaadeeth from the da’eef by checking the chain of narrators and knowing who is reliable and who is weak.”

        So the sunan books, such as Sunan Abi Dawud, could have weak hadiths! Poor Zozo…the monkey keeps getting roasted.

        Back to cleaning your daddy Satan’s toilet. 😆

        Liked by 1 person

      6. Really then show me one scholar who doesn’t agree with what i gave. Show me don’t come with your garbage. I gave Sunan Abu Daud. Now show me one scholar who says that the hadith is not trusted. Come and give your evidence son of Muta. Be a man not an impotent like Muhammad. Who had toothpick instead of penis. Come and give your proof. Really I pity your wife and your mother who as an impotent son and husband like you. Did you find the father of your daughter.


      7. 🤦‍♂️🤣😂🤣 I already did you moron! Al-Albani graded the hadith as weak!

        And what did you give? A link to IslamQA which actually disproves you? 😂 You truly are the dumbest indian crosstian I have to ever seen!

        Have you found an Indian woman who is willing to even touch a filthy monkey like you? 🤣 Still living the single life as a lonely, sexually-frustrated, toilet-cleanig monkey? Get a life monkey. Stop embarrassing yourself with your childish outbursts.

        Now go back to cleaning Satan’s toilet.

        Liked by 2 people

      8. 🤦‍♂️ Are you high on drugs again dummy? Is your goldfish memory acting up again?

        Read the link from IslamQA moron. It says that Sunans like Sunan Abu Dawud can have weak hadiths. Only Bukhari and Muslim are considered to be have only Sahih hadiths.

        Back to that toilet with you monkey. Satan is waiting. 😂


      9. He said they can be used to make rulings moron. That doesn’t change the fact that it is not at the highest confidence level.

        And for the 5th time, the Hadith doesn’t even say “our father” you baboon. Do you admit that you lied?

        Back to that toilet with you. 😆


      10. No, no monkey. He said weak hadiths can be graded as B- to even D-. So it depends on each Hadith. You should know. I’m sure you have seen many Ds and Fs in your days. No wonder you have the intellect of a child. 😄

        You’re still not admitting that you lied about the Hadith. It does not say “our father”. Admit it monkey.

        No go eat more poop bread.


      11. 😂 Monkey, all that poop bread is making you stupid. You got roasted as usual. Weak hadiths are not just “accepted” dummy.

        Once again, why did you lie about the Hadith? Admit it monkey.

        Still living the single life? Aww, are you lonely monkey? No woman will touch you? Is that it? No wonder you are obsessed with other men’s bodies. Jealous, eh monkey? Or you trying to come out of the closet? 😆


      12. Moron, did you read the link? The scholars were divided on this. Even Hamza Yusuf graded weak hadiths from B- to D-, showing that they had different confidence levels.

        Does Satan stay at your house with you and your mother? Or is he a deadbeat dad? 😂

        How’s the poop bread?


      13. Moron, he said the margin of error was greater than with Hasan or Sahih hadiths. Plus, as the link I gave showed, the scholars didn’t agree on whether they “passed”. It depends on a case by case basis. Here is what Ibn Taymiyyah said about it:

        “It is not permissible in Islam to rely on weak ahaadeeth that are neither saheeh nor hasan, but Ahmad ibn Hanbal and other scholars regarded it is permissible to narrate reports concerning righteous deeds which are not known to be proven, so long as they are not known to be lies, on the basis that if an action is known to be prescribed in Islam from shar’i evidence, and there is a hadeeth which is not known to be a lie, it is possible that the reward referred to in that weak hadeeth may be true. None of the imams said that it is permissible to regard something as obligatory or mustahabb on the basis of a weak hadeeth; whoever says that is going against scholarly consensus. It is permissible to narrate reports that are not known to be lies in order to encourage and warn people, but only with regard to matters where it is known that Allaah has encouraged or warned against them on the basis of other evidence the status of whose narrators is not unknown.”

        Now, back to that poop bread of yours. And is your daddy’s toilet cleaner yet? Satan is waiting.


      14. Ooo now you can’t refute Hamzah Yusuf so went to Ibn Tamiyya. Woww but this is Abu Daud not Zakir Naik or Ahmed Deedat. Don’t jump like monkey when Muslims feel they throw away the hadith and scholars and when they feel they accept. Muslim can’t be trusted because you are filthy and hypocrite and shameless swine.


      15. Lol, you moron! Ibn Taymiyyah was one of the greatest scholars of all time! The point is that your moronic appeal to one video does not tell the whole story. That’s what uneducated monkeys like you do. You comment on topics you have no understanding of.

        Still waiting for an answer monkey. Why did you lie about the Hadith? You can keep running but I will find you. 😉

        Did you eat that poop bread? You seem to like it alot, huh? 😂🤣


      16. Yes Ibn Tamiyya is great scholar but he quotes Abu Daud. So Ibn Tamiyya agrees with me son of Muta. Go sniff Muhammad arsehole. Hamza Yusuf agrees with me Ibn Tamiyya agrees with me and Abu Daud is authentic. So there is no weak or daeef hadith. All are same. Great. Ibn Tamiyya will never say Abu Daud is weak. So impotent go get under your mother’s skirt and tell your wife to breastfeed me i am thirsty


      17. Hey monkey, you’re still not answering the question? Too busy eating your god’s poop bread? Why did you lie about the hadith?

        Abu Dawud was a great scholar too moron. But as I showed, his Sunan does have some weak hadiths. And as Ibn Taymiyyah explained, Muslims are not obligated to follow such hadith. Here is what Ibn Taymiyyah said since you don’t know how to read:

        “None of the imams said that it is permissible to regard something as obligatory or mustahabb on the basis of a weak hadeeth; whoever says that is going against scholarly consensus.”

        Give it up monkey. You keep getting roasted on this issue. Your child-level intellect is way out of its league.

        Now go back to that poop bread while you clean your father’s toilet. 🤣


      18. Son of Satan, why did you lie about the Hadith? Where does it say “our father”? Why do you keep running away from answering the question? You can run but you can’t hide. I will find you and humiliate you. 😁


  1. mr.heathcliff

    And stop drinking camel piss. ”

    show me one place in bible where yhwhjebus said “don’t drink camel piss, cow piss, dog piss and human piss” ?

    back in those days you would literally put your indian mouth under the balls of camel just to get direct urine.

    Liked by 2 people

      1. 🤣😂 No monkey, the choice is yours. Your god gave a direct command to eat bread cooked over human feces. But then he made a concession and allowed cow dung to be used instead. Yeah, that’s much better! 😂

        In contrast, the Hadith about camel urine was not a direct command to Muslims. It is not a religious obligation. It was used as a medicine in that time.

        So let’s review just in case your monkey brain cannot process it:

        1. Your god gave a command to eat bread cooked over poop.
        2. There is no command to Muslims to drink camel urine.

        Now go eat some of that delicious poop bread from your god’s kitchen.


        Liked by 1 person

      2. Hahaha, you really are an idiot! Too stupid to know that urine had been used by many civilizations for various reasons. Even in modern times, we use horse urine to make medicine for postmenopausal women. Look it up dummy. It’s called Premarin.

        All that poop bread from your god has made you stupid. No wonder you’re a Crosstian. 🤣😁😁😁


      3. Lol, what happened monkey? No response so you resort to mindless spamming? Did you look up Premarin monkey? Maybe your mom uses it.

        And again, as I said, a little camel urine mixed with milk was used in those times as a medicine. It is not a religious obligation for Muslims. In contrast, your god gave an order to the Israelites to actually bake bread over feces! What kind of a command is that? 🤢


      4. Monkey, stop spamming and admit you lost…again. As I said, there is no religious obligation for Muslims to use camel urine as medicine anymore. It was in that time because they were a desert people.

        Did you look up Premarin? What are you afraid of? Ask your mom. Maybe she has some.


      5. 😂🤣😂 Yeah, I know that monkey. I didn’t say that it was mixed dummy. You think cooking it over human feces is just fine? 🤯 So you would eat bread that was cooked over feces? You really are a filthy monkey! 😁😁😁

        Keep exposing your perverted, filthy mind monkey. You show the true nature of Christians. You are a son of Satan. 🤣

        Are you still looking for a woman who is willing to even touch a filthy monkey like you? Jealous, eh monkey? 🤣


      6. Hey monkey, stop deflecting and wasting time. Go ahead and ask your mother about Premarin. Don’t be shy. Then you can both eat some fecal bread together as a family. You can break bread with your daddy Satan. 😆


      1. Monkey, Paul was a false apostle. He lied for a living and even admitted it.

        So angels had sex with humans? I bet you wish you were one of them! 😂

        Are you a virgin monkey? You probably will remain one your entire existence because no woman is willing to touch you. Poor lonely monkey. No wonder you are so obsessed with pornography. 🤣😂


      2. Now, now monkey. Don’t get frustrated and angry. Just ask your mother about Premarin. Don’t be shy.

        You have been roasted on a daily basis on this blog even since you made the fatal mistake of commenting here. You have been embarrassed over and over again. You jump around like a diseased baboon when you get refuted and fail to answer any questions.

        Why did you lie about “our father” in the hadith?
        Was your god evil for ordering the murders of infants?
        How old were the little girls in Numbers 31:18?
        Are you a virgin? Will no woman even touch a filthy porn-addicted monkey like you?


  2. mr.heathcliff

    Also the Prophet (s) kept business relations with Jews until his death, demonstrating that was he was amicable with amicable Jews and only opposed hostile anti-Muslim Jews:

    Liked by 2 people

    1. mr.heathcliff

      from twitter.
      me: if modi said to zozo to suck on his balls and he(modi) will increase persecution of muslims, then we r warned against people like zozo. you see, jesus told zozo to watch his sister get raped by modis armies AND TURN the other cheek and live a LIFE loving your persecutor EVEN if he forces his balls in your (zozos) mouth, a MUSLIM on the other hand would consider it a SIN to watch a RAPE AND JUST STAND and watch.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. stewjo004

    @ Tony

    Glad you asked in one of Paul’s many faces he circumcises his student Timothy in Acts 16 so we can reasonably conclude he probably sucked his penis.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s