> The text actually says they’ll call on the name of the Lord,
green:
No, it doesn’t. The Hebrew says Yahweh. Where is your evidence this is not the case?
Ahmed:
Do you deny that Jews of old would replace the name of God in the text or do you accede en toto to the scripture of the Essenes? No evidence is needed beyond that. If it is your assertion that it has always read YHWH, then please feel free to present a text that meets this standard.
mrheathcliff:
faiz and stew , can you guys clarify to me ijaz ahmeds point. I think i get it but would like clarity on it
Hilarious
LikeLiked by 1 person
i still believe the prick bob the builder was joel
LikeLike
Coco?
LikeLiked by 1 person
> The text actually says they’ll call on the name of the Lord,
green:
No, it doesn’t. The Hebrew says Yahweh. Where is your evidence this is not the case?
Ahmed:
Do you deny that Jews of old would replace the name of God in the text or do you accede en toto to the scripture of the Essenes? No evidence is needed beyond that. If it is your assertion that it has always read YHWH, then please feel free to present a text that meets this standard.
mrheathcliff:
faiz and stew , can you guys clarify to me ijaz ahmeds point. I think i get it but would like clarity on it
JazakAllah
LikeLiked by 1 person
I guess he’s saying that since Jews were forbidden to write the name, that would necessitate removing it from the manuscripts of the Bible.
LikeLike