7 thoughts on “No offence intended but don’t these Christians realise they sound like vampires?”
they made a human into a livitical sacrifice , the priestly writers would have vomited. there is no way those priestly writers would have imagined this fetish for human flesh and blood. this is 100 % mind cannibalism.
these guys imagine the gory details to “connect” with their gods. lol
how about the circumcision of jesus, when the flesh was cut, it bled.
but they don’t want cuts, then need proper hardcore roman flesh piercing act. they need to make “virgin jesus” bleeeeed.
Not exactly, Craig Evans lied as I’ve pointed out in my reply below, and so did Gary Habermas, he claimed here (January 2018!) that the manuscript dated to 80-110 AD and that the date was “just given”. Now in the entire affair Habermas’ lie is far less serious, but it does show to what extent the American Evangelicals will lie to their own audience! Evens however had to have been involved with the deception, or if not him someone else directly connected to the Greens who told him that information. However we have to assume it was him, and possibly in collaboration with others.
MORE swimming in jesus’ blood.
never TRUST a crosstian!
they made a human into a livitical sacrifice , the priestly writers would have vomited. there is no way those priestly writers would have imagined this fetish for human flesh and blood. this is 100 % mind cannibalism.
these guys imagine the gory details to “connect” with their gods. lol
how about the circumcision of jesus, when the flesh was cut, it bled.
but they don’t want cuts, then need proper hardcore roman flesh piercing act. they need to make “virgin jesus” bleeeeed.
LikeLike
@ Tony
What makes it more ironic is Zoze posting saying we are allowed to be cannibals lol.
LikeLike
just imagine this gory detail
a roman slices jesus’ flesh and then this christian opens his mouth and drinks the blood. what the hell is this?
LikeLike
their you go. doing sins and then bathing in blood. now imagine human batching in blood. what the hell is this fetish?
LikeLiked by 1 person
https://old.reddit.com/r/AcademicBiblical/comments/c4f9r9/brent_nongbri_has_been_informed_that_dirk_obbink/
swim in thy blood for lies lies and lies.
LikeLike
evangelical scholars are involved in lies and deceptions, check out brent nongbris blog
LikeLike
read the comments on academic biblical
from aractus
Not exactly, Craig Evans lied as I’ve pointed out in my reply below, and so did Gary Habermas, he claimed here (January 2018!) that the manuscript dated to 80-110 AD and that the date was “just given”. Now in the entire affair Habermas’ lie is far less serious, but it does show to what extent the American Evangelicals will lie to their own audience! Evens however had to have been involved with the deception, or if not him someone else directly connected to the Greens who told him that information. However we have to assume it was him, and possibly in collaboration with others.
MORE swimming in jesus’ blood.
never TRUST a crosstian!
LikeLiked by 1 person