Over at BloggingTheology, I am in a discussion with a guy named “Seeker”, who is a strong proponent of Darwinian evolution and a critic of “intelligent design” (ID) theory. Below is the discussion so far. Notice that he is basically arguing that since there is scientific “consensus” that Darwinian evolution is true, theories like ID are therefore “pseudo-science”. This is a common argument raised by “stubborn atheists”, as one scientist refers to people like “Seeker”, even though there are many scientists who have critiqued at least some elements of evolutionary theory, especially on the issue of the creative power of “natural selection”. Also notice that he is not very learned on basic biological concepts like “natural selection”.