Madman’s troubles continue…

https://bloggingtheology.net/2017/11/28/god-has-made-his-light-shine-for-those-who-seek-for-him/#comment-65105

It just keeps getting worse and worse for poor madman…

 

  • I’m sure you’ll like this law Faiz:

    1 Chronicles 16

    13 O ye seed of Israel his servant, ye children of Jacob, his chosen ones.
    14 He is the LORD our God; his judgments are in all the earth.
    15 Be ye mindful always of his covenant; the word which he commanded to a thousand generations;
    16 Even of the covenant which he made with Abraham, and of his oath unto Isaac;
    17 And hath confirmed the same to Jacob for a law, and to Israel for an everlasting covenant,
    18 Saying, Unto thee will I give the land of Canaan, the lot of your inheritance;

    Like

    • Hahaha, nice try at changing the subject! You dummies do that whenever you are unable to answer questions.

      I don’t believe in the Bible, stupid. You do. The Bible’s promises are YOUR problem, not mine! The Tanakh disproves Christianity, as I have shown numerous times already.

      Now answer my questions, you lying demon. You can run, but you can’t hide.

      1. Show me where it is stated that menstrual blood no longer defiles a person.
      2. Tertullian said that the sabbath observance was temporary. Why didn’t the early Christians keep the sabbath?

      Like

       
  • Faiz said: “I don’t believe in the Bible, stupid. You do. The Bible’s promises are YOUR problem, not mine! The Tanakh disproves Christianity, as I have shown numerous times already. ”

    lol, your prophet must have believed a lot that was in the bible because he copied swaths of it to make his book. The only new thing in Islam is Mohammed himself. Everything else is copied from Jews, pagans and Christians.

    Jesus, James and Paul agree with each other and confirm the moral teaching of the OT.

    Gentiles are indwelt by the Spirit of God without the need of the law which established an earthly priesthood, the temple and sacrificial rites. The laws of clean and unclean were only be applied in this context.

    “As touching the Gentiles which believe, we have written and concluded that they observe no such thing, save only that they keep themselves from things offered to idols, and from blood, and from strangled, and from fornication.”

    This is the law of the weaker brother which is not mandatory but done so as not to offend. Of course fornication was always forbidden as both Jesus and Paul commanded:

    Paul writes in 1 Thess 4:

    3 For this is the will of God, even your sanctification, that ye should abstain from fornication: 4 That every one of you should know how to possess his vessel in sanctification and honour; 5 Not in the lust of concupiscence, even as the Gentiles which know not God:

    Muslims try and picture Christians as antinomian and lawless. There is no basis for this from the NT. Rather the jihadi becomes antimonian in relation to the infidel. Don’t you agree? This is a clever ruse.

    The clean and unclean in Ezekiel’s vision of the temple are symbolic of believers and unbelievers in the time of the new covenant and in the final state.

    Peter’s vision confirms that the laws of clean and unclean no longer apply.

    The early christians did keep a form of the sabbath. They rested from their work and assembled together to worship and have fellowship with each other and with God. This is the ideal form of the Sabbath which existed before the law of Moses.

    Please add this to your blog article. No editing please.

    Like

    • “lol, your prophet must have believed a lot that was in the bible because he copied swaths of it to make his book. The only new thing in Islam is Mohammed himself. Everything else is copied from Jews, pagans and Christians.”

      LOL, trying again to change the subject? What does Islam have to do with the fact that your Bible doesn’t agree with itself? Why don’t you try to respond to the clear contradictions between the Tanakh and your pathetic “New Testament”?

      Speaking of copying, why does your Bible copy from Canaanite paganism and refer to your god as an old man? Why does it borrow the myth of Leviathan from the Canaanites? See what changing the subject got you? You dug yourself into an even bigger hole! HAHAHAHAHA! Madman…such a loser!!!

      “Jesus, James and Paul agree with each other and confirm the moral teaching of the OT.”

      Oh please, stop making me laugh so much! Your fantasies don’t apply here. Anyone with an ounce of reason knows that there are numerous contradictions between Jesus and Paul.

      “Gentiles are indwelt by the Spirit of God without the need of the law which established an earthly priesthood, the temple and sacrificial rites. The laws of clean and unclean were only be applied in this context.”

      Blah, blah, blah. I have heard this meaningless fairy tale before. Your apostles clearly stated that Gentiles were to abstain from certain things. Therefore, your nonsense is refuted. Try again, loser.

      “This is the law of the weaker brother which is not mandatory but done so as not to offend. Of course fornication was always forbidden as both Jesus and Paul commanded:”

      LOL, picking and choosing again? This clearly has nothing to do with the “weaker brother” BS, because even in Revelation, the same law was repeated: abstain from food sacrificed to idols and sexual immorality, or face judgement.

      “Muslims try and picture Christians as antinomian and lawless. There is no basis for this from the NT. Rather the jihadi becomes antimonian in relation to the infidel. Don’t you agree? This is a clever ruse.”

      ROFTL, again trying to distract from your failures? You have proven over and over again that you are a hypocrite. Your entire religion is built upon hypocrisy. You pick and choose what is most convenient. So yeah, you idiots are “lawless”. You make up your own rules because of the deception of your Satanic apostle Paul. How fitting that you will join him in hell on the Day of Judgment, unless of course if you repent.

      “The clean and unclean in Ezekiel’s vision of the temple are symbolic of believers and unbelievers in the time of the new covenant and in the final state.”

      Yaaaaawn, getting bored again from your BS. Your nonsense was apparently lost on the author of Ezekiel! He gave minute details about the temple, its rites and festivals and the following of the law TO THE LETTER. Why don’t you explain the “symbolism” of the following verse loser?

      “This is what the Sovereign Lord says: No foreigner uncircumcised in heart and flesh is to enter my sanctuary, not even the foreigners who live among the Israelites.” (Ezekiel 44:9)

      LOL, what is this symbolizing? Were the Gentiles not allowed in your pathetic church???

      “Peter’s vision confirms that the laws of clean and unclean no longer apply.”

      ROFTL!! This was again lost on the author of Revelation! And James didn’t seem to be aware of this so-called “vision”!

      You do realize, you lying demon, that your own Bible requires two witnesses for confirmation? Thus, Peter’s alleged “vision” violates your own Bible! He was the only one who had the vision, and no one else! LOL!

      “But if they will not listen, take one or two others along, so that ‘every matter may be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses.’” (Matthew 18:16)

      “The early christians did keep a form of the sabbath. They rested from their work and assembled together to worship and have fellowship with each other and with God. This is the ideal form of the Sabbath which existed before the law of Moses.”

      Hahahaha, oh you stupid, stupid man! You keep proving with your own words that you Christians are nothing but hypocrites! Where did God say to keep “a form of the sabbath”? The Tanakh is very clear on the “form”. You were to do no work, not even cooking. Christians were very quick to abandon this law. Tertullian felt that it was a “temporary” law.

      You still haven’t told me your sabbath routine. Why do you keep running, madman?

      “Please add this to your blog article. No editing please.”

      You don’t have to keep asking snookums. I will be glad to humiliate you. And I don’t edit anything. Are you suggesting I edited your comments, loser? When will you stop lying, demon?

      Now answer my questions, you lying demon. You can run, but you can’t hide.

      1. Show me where it is stated that menstrual blood no longer defiles a person.
      2. Tertullian said that the sabbath observance was temporary. Why didn’t the early Christians keep the sabbath?

 

 

 

 

2 thoughts on “Madman’s troubles continue…

  1. “Jesus, James and Paul agree with each other and confirm the moral teaching of the OT.”

    lol , this retard…. lol

    no jew makes separation like this turd does. they do not separate “moral law” from “ceremonial” law, this turdy pig blood drinking swine bob goes against his holy bible

    i quote :

    It is a command in the Torah and observant Jews obey those commands. I’m not sure I can call it “moral” or “ceremonial”. It’s obedience to God’s Law. When you obey a posted traffic sign, is it moral or ceremonial? I don’t think so. I think you obey because it is the law and there are consequences for disobeying it. The author of GMark voided this dietary law.

    Uri

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s